no roving charges

Patrick Fitzgerald has announced that Karl Rove won’t face charges related to the Plame leak. It seemed like something I should mention, but I don’t really know how to feel about it. I mean, it would be great to believe that he really had nothing to do with it, but the information had to come from somewhere.

But speaking of great mysteries, Jeffrey Nielsen, a Mormon and a professor at BYU, was recently fired for writing this editorial, in which he says, “I believe opposing gay marriage and seeking a constitutional amendment against it is immoral.” I was going to try to pull out some highlights, but the whole piece is great, so instead I’ll just recommend reading it.

integral travels

Last night my father and I drove to Manhattan’s Upper West Side to meet Ken Wilber. My dad was invited because he’s made some posts to the Integral Education online forum, and the email he received said something like, “Ken’s making an unprecedented visit to meet the NY integral community.” The address given was for a private apartment. That was all we knew.

We did, of course, know that no one in their right mind drives to Manhattan. For a variety of reasons, we decided to ignore this bit of common sense. I should probably say right here and now that I had never been to New York City. However, I ended up doing all of the city driving. Had we not allowed a full two and a half extra hours in our itinerary, it would have been a very stressful experience. As it was, we were both able to remain calm even when we realized, immediately after emerging from the Lincoln Tunnel, that we were as lost as one can be in Manhattan. The highlight for me was when, while most of my mind was occupied with not running over pedestrians, I realized that we were driving through Times Square. To me, Times Square looks like a wall of people conspiring to keep me from making it through the intersection before the light changes. But.

It could have been a lot worse. It was, admittedly, overwhelming at the time, but now that I am a safe distance from trying to figure out how the hell to get onto Broadway without having to make a left turn, it seems more exhilarating than scary. But.

I don’t plan to drive into Manhattan again any time soon.

Once we found our destination and parked in the garage I’d found online, we found the building where we were to be at five (half a block from the garage), and crossed the street to spend the next two hours in Central Park. It was not really warm enough to spend two hours in Central Park, but it was lovely in the sun, and tolerable even without. We watched a young woman dancing on rollerskates, an elderly woman exercising, and hundreds of people just walking through; we listened to a saxophonist, and, not far away, a trio of cellists. I used a surprisingly clean but still absolutely disgusting bathroom. Mostly, we sat on park benches and absorbed the New Yorkness until it was time to find the specified apartment.

When we arrived, a few minutes after five, the living room of the apartment was full — FULL — of people. Maybe 40-50. Ken Wilber was seated facing the group. My dad and I found our nametags and took two of the last remaining seats. Because we missed maybe the first minute of Ken talking, I still really don’t know what he was doing in New York. Oh well.

The evening turned out to be kind of a group conversation. After the hour-plus spent on everyone introducing themselves to the group (“Hi, I’m Julia. I’m from Harrisburg, PA, and a student at McDaniel College in Maryland. A few years ago, my dad said to me, “You should really read this book A Theory of Everything. We’re involved with a self-proclaimed Integral school in Harrisburg.”), Ken talked about what he’s been doing, about some ideas from his upcoming book, and some thoughts apparently sparked by things people had said during the introductions. A lot of it was really abstract, and I have to admit I got a little lost for parts of it. We left at 9:30, after four and a half hours of that; it looked like it could be continuing for hours more. Part of me wanted to stay longer, but by the time we pulled into the driveway of my parents’ house at 1 AM, I was glad we’d left when we did. Also, my brain was full.

Hm. I keep starting a thought and then deleting it. I think I’m not done processing some of the mini-epiphanies I had last night and have had in the meantime enough to commit them to writing. Also, part of me is probably afraid you’ll all think I’ve lost it. On the other hand, I want to say something that will inspire you, my dear reader, to start thinking about Integral theory.

I’m at a loss. Wikipedia has an article, though, that might make for a good jumping off point. It’s here. Also, if you’re really motivated, A Theory of Everything, also mentioned above, is a good introduction. I’m told A Brief History of Everything is an even better introduction, but I haven’t read it, so I can’t, in good conscience, recommend it.

kitzmiller verdict

Issued today in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:

For the reasons that follow, we hold that the ID Policy is unconstitutional pursuant to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Art. I, § 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

I haven’t read the whole opinion yet (it’s 139 pages long!), but here’s CNN’s take on it, and here’s a link to download the opinion yourself.

struggling with homoerotic desires

This kind of thing continues to piss me off.

Given the discussion over my comments about the actions of the United Methodist Church I think I should add this disclaimer: I absolutely believe that the Catholic church has the right to make any decision they want about anyone joining the clergy, taking communion, stepping foot on their property, etc.

That said — man, I wish they wouldn’t.

As I understand it, celibacy is already a requirement of the Catholic priesthood. I would think that means that no one who “practices homosexuality” should be a priest, but no one who practices heterosexuality should be either.

Beyond the clear implication that gays are more likely to be pedophiles (which is, in my mind, the most objectionable piece of this), is the church saying that homoerotic desires are somehow, by nature, harder to control? That homosexuality is somehow fundamental to one’s being? If it is that fundamental to one’s being, does that mean, perhaps, that it is a preference one is born with? And if it is something one is born with, could that make it part of “God’s Plan”?

Note: I’ve received a few emails/comments pointing out that my logic in this post is flawed. I addressed it in one comment, but I wanted to include it in the post as well. I wasn’t trying to construct a serious intellectual argument here. Rather, I was responding to one of the arguments I’ve heard for churches trying to get gays to adopt straight lifestyles, which is that homosexuality is a choice rather than innate preference. The argument I’ve heard goes that it can’t be innate, because God wouldn’t make someone gay. What the Catholic church seems to be saying is that “gayness” is innate, but if we’re using the logic that other religious groups have applied, then if it is innate, it’s gotta be endowed by God. I should have been more explicit about what I was getting at. (updated 12/7/2005, 16:59)

vote your deepest values

From the Washington Post:

The Internal Revenue Service has warned a prominent liberal church that it could lose its tax-exempt status because of an anti-war sermon a guest preacher gave on the eve of the 2004 presidential election, according to church officials.

So…enlisting churches to help with the re-election of the president is okay.

Giving a sermon about the fundamental tenets of Christianity — “Thou shalt not kill” and all that — is not?

I’m not sure about The Middle America Chronicle’s assertion that as long as a church “doesn’t specifically say “Vote Republican” or “Elect Democrats,” it shouldn’t be intimidated by the IRS,” but certainly a church’s tax-exempt status shouldn’t be called into question simply for preaching a sermon that extrapolates values to real world issues.

The sermon is archived on the church’s website. It is certainly critical of Bush, and does say things like, “When you go into the voting booth on Tuesday, take with you all that you know about Jesus, the peacemaker. Take all that Jesus means to you. Then vote your deepest values.” At no point, though, does it actually endorse Kerry or any part of his “plan”.

Clearly I’m not an expert on tax-exempt rules, and I am probably a bit biased in this particular case, but I think this is okay. It’s certainly a far cry from paying for an advertisement, which the Post cites as an example of activity conducted by a church that previously lost its status. And I’m sure there were much more blatant endorsements coming from less prominent pulpits that Sunday.

meager little great paradigm shift

I’m posting from Gathering Grounds, a coffeehouse here in Westminster. It’s a cute little place, consisting of four tables, four couches, and more high school outcasts than I’ve seen since the Wire. It’s nothing like the Wire, except that it does seem to be a “gathering ground” for the aforementioned teenagers. It’s pretty low key and relatively quiet, and no one seems to be doing anything remotely close to crazy. But anyway, I should be working on my novel.

I just wanted to draw your attention to this article about the close of the Dover Intelligent Design trial. The Washington Post also pointed out a few days ago that the Dover school board is up for re-election on Tuesday. I’ll be interested to see how that turns out.

straight & narrow

A big BOO to the United Methodist Church for its decisions yesterday to defrock a lesbian minister, reinstate (with back pay) a Virginia minister who refused membership in his congregation to a gay man, and reject a declaration that there is a “difference of opinion among faithful Christians regarding sexual orientation and practice.”

The last point is the one that bothers me most. Does rejection of that declaration mean that the UMC is saying that people who hold different opinions on the issue cannot also be faithful Christians?

brotherly hand

I don’t know enough about, or have enough involvement in, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict to have an opinion about the pullout, but this snippet had an impact.

“This is a stupid order,” a man in Morag yelled at an Israeli army commander, who responded by hugging the settler.

“For God’s sake, you are a Jew. You are my brother,” another man yelled.

The army commander hugged and kissed that settler too…

Israeli forces arrest 50 at Gaza settlement